Heart Transplant Research - Risks, Prognosis, Procedure, Surgery, Organ Donation

Heart Transplant Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Heart Transplant, including details on risks, prognosis, procedure, surgery, organ donation.


Heart Transplant Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Heart Transplant

Books on Heart Transplant

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Organ-specific differences in the function of MCP-1 and CXCR3 during cardiac and skin allograft rejection.

Haskova Z, Izawa A, Contreras AG, Flynn E, Boulday G, Briscoe DM

Transplantation Research Center and the Division of Nephrology, Children's Hospital Boston, and the Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

BACKGROUND: Chemokines are well-established to function in the recruitment of leukocytes into allografts in the course of rejection. Moreover, some studies have indicated that there are organ-specific differences in chemokine function, but the mechanism accounting for this difference is not known. METHODS: Fully major histocompatibility complex-mismatched vascularized cardiac transplants or skin transplants were performed using BALB/c (H-2d), C57BL/6 (H-2b), MCP-1-/- (H-2b) and CXCR3-/- (H-2b) mice as donors or recipients. Also, skin grafts (H-2b) were placed onto SCID mice (H-2d) that received BALB/c splenocytes (H-2d) by adoptive transfer either at the time of transplantation, or after a period of 28 days. RESULTS: Cardiac allografts in MCP-1-/- recipients survived significantly longer (P<0.0005) than wild-type (WT) controls. However, there was no prolongation of survival when MCP-1-/- grafts were used a donors in WT mice. In contrast, the absence of donor but not recipient MCP-1 prolonged skin allograft survival. WT donor cardiac grafts in CXCR3-/- recipients had a modest prolongation of survival (P<0.0005), whereas CXCR3-/- donor cardiac grafts in WT recipients were rejected similar to controls. Also, while recipient CXCR3 had no effect on the rejection of skin, CXCR3-/- donor skin grafts survived significantly longer than WT controls. This survival advantage was lost when vascularized CXCR3-/- skin grafts were used as donors in the SCID model of rejection. CONCLUSION: Recipient derived MCP-1 and CXCR3 are functional in the rejection of vascularized, but not nonvascularized, allografts. In contrast, donor-derived MCP-1 and CXCR3 are functional in nonvascularized, but not vascularized grafts.

Published 25 June 2007 in Transplantation, 83(12): 1595-601.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2005-2008 Heart Transplant Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Heart Transplant Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2005)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 2 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)



Heart Transplant Books

Cardiac Allograft Rejection

Cardiac Allograft Rejection